January 22, 2026, fifty three years after the Supreme Court of the United States decided that a woman’s “right” to kill her unborn child (abortion) was a constitutional privilege and could not be denied her. For any reason. By anyone, including the father of the child. See Roe v. Wade.
I wrote this article in 20191, almost six years ago, and decided to repost it here as a memorial to all those who have been slaughtered for the sake of convenience and selfishness. You are not forgotten.
Abortion, as it is practiced today, is a suicide machine.2 No apologies to Bruce Springsteen. His politics speak for him.
We are told from the very beginning that humans are part of the animal kingdom, that there’s really no difference at all between humans and chimpanzees or cockroaches, for that matter. We are all a product of evolution, a result of nature constantly weeding out the weak, inefficient, and hapless. Oh, and there is one other matter which distinguishes us—humans know the difference between right and wrong, that is, we understand a moral code, while all the other animals operate from a position of instinct.
What’s really interesting about this is that other animals, operating instinctively, do not deliberately kill their unborn children. Women, on the other hand, who are supposed to have risen to the very top of the pyramid of knowledge and understanding, will and do. Animal mothers will do anything and everything they instinctively know how to do to perpetuate their lineage, yet human mothers will do anything and everything they can, legally or otherwise, to destroy their offspring.
If there is one difference between animals and humans, it is this. Animals struggle to continue their lineage, humans act to destroy theirs.
Evolution, it is said, is a process by which the best of the best pass on their genes and characteristics to ensuing generations, thereby ensuring that the strongest and the most fit of the species survives and prospers. The weaker, less fit ones die out. As a whole, the entire species becomes better and more adapted to its environment. Well, then, consider this.
If the above statement is true, then women who abort their unborn children are not passing on their characteristics to the future generations, instead they’re removing them from the gene pool. This is in contrast to those women who deliver children and raise them up to become productive members of the human race, including the reproduction of children of their own through untold generations.
From an evolutionary viewpoint, over the long run, it is evident that women who abort their children will eventually die out, while those who don’t will continue the species. This leads to the conclusion that women who abort are the weaker members of the species and, since we are only animals anyway, they should and will be weeded out. For the benefit of humanity as a whole, you understand. And you should also understand that this is a tongue-in-cheek comment and is not meant to degrade any woman at all.
Coupled with this is the moral understanding that human beings should not kill each other, that there are negative consequences of these acts, and that humanity suffers when lethal violence is perpetrated against one member of society by another. Any society which practices or condones the widespread killing of its citizens, born or unborn, is participating in the demise of its future, dooming it to extinction.
It appears then, that abortion proponents and women who practice abortions are actually committing suicide, genetically speaking. As time goes on, the proportion of women who choose to give life to their unborn children will grow in relation to those who choose to kill theirs. Eventually, the numbers will become so lopsided that even the politicians will take note of it. Whether the suicidal members of society do or not is a different story. If they are consistent in their evolution and their beliefs, they will remain so to the very end, until they are all gone, when there are no more members of the human race who are willing to destroy their own children for their own selfish ends and survival of the fittest will be proven correct once again.
On this issue, evolution and morals appear to have collaborated. Abortion is not only morally wrong and detrimental to human relations, but also immensely destructive to the survival of the human species. Those who practice it will be eliminated—one way or another. As an evolutionary practice, abortion leads to death (extinction). As a moral practice, abortion leads to death (extinction). Abortion, quite simply, is suicidal. It is not beneficial nor wise.
“All those who hate me [wisdom], love death.” (Proverbs 8:36)
- At the time, I was posting to a blog which was dedicated to the abortion issue, but when Covid hit in early 2020, I couldn’t keep up with everything and let this one expire. I have all the articles posted on it and may air them here from time to time. ↩︎
- A term used in Bruce Springsteen’s 1975 hit song, “Born to Run”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3t9SfrfDZM ↩︎
Poor Roger's Almanac 
Abortion is not always an act of violence. In fact, sometimes it delivers a live baby, and I’m not talking about those that survive a botched attempt to murder them.
The battle against this atrocity begins with identifying it correctly. By calling it “abortion,” we’ve already acquiesced to the opposition’s terminology. Look up “abortion” and “miscarriage” in any dictionary. A miscarriage is an abortion. In fact, term babies qualify as abortions. Why? Because they were aborted from their mothers’ wombs by natural means, as God designed.
What doctors (and parents) do to infants in the womb is in utero infanticide. Had Roe v. Wade been waged over infanticide rather than abortion, it would have never made it to the court room. In fact, by employing the word “abortion,” Roe v. Wade was won before it ever got to court.
The Greek word “brephos” employed in the New Testament for infants already born is the same word used for infants in the womb (Luke 2:12 and Luke 1:41), without specifying the precise moment they became a “brephos.” Therefore, our only option is to then accept that they became such at conception. Thus, intentionally killing a brephos at any point is “brephocide” or, more properly, infanticide.
The same is true for one of the Hebrew words translated “child.”
The point being, we Christians need to stop using the non-Christians’ watered-down, politically correct terms such as “abortion” and “gay.” It’s infanticide and sodomy. There is no power in the former terms against evil and our first mistake is in acquiescing to the ungodly’s terminology.
Listen to Part 1 of “Word Wars & Captive Thoughts” at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php#T849
Ted,
With all due respect, abortion is the termination of the unborn child, a killing of the human being still in the womb, infanticide. On this we are agreed and, yes, we need to call it for what it is–murder.
I disagree with you on your statement that a normal, natural delivery is an abortion. The delivery of a live child into the world is a successful end to a mission. The term “abortion” is always used (I looked up several dictionary/Internet definitions) in a negative manner, the abrupt stoppage of an event gone wrong, a failure. In this sense, a miscarriage IS an abortion, as it results from the spontaneous, natural death of the infant in the womb. The mission cannot be continued to a successful conclusion, hence is aborted. A live birth is not a failure, hence, is not an abortion.
Semantics aside, everyone on this planet who is aware KNOWS what the term abortion means. The fact that many of them don’t equate it with the taking of a human life is not due to the wrong terminology, it stems from the constant refusal of self-conscious people to acknowledge that it is morally and criminally wrong. No amount of bickering and squabbling over the “correct” term is going to change that. Only the Spirit of God can accomplish that miracle.
Our mission is to speak the truth, to preach the Word, and to encourage others to incorporate it into their lives consistently. If we do that, then we are going to have to get down into the trenches, into the pit, the mud, the blood, and the beer, because those who currently live there are not going to come out on their own. This means we have to get dirty and if it means we adopt language they understand in order to make our point, then, so be it. Amen!
All that being said, is my the premise of the article’s argument correct? Is the practice of killing unborn children suicidal or not? Can we expect anything other than the death of our society because we allow it to happen?
“I disagree with you on your statement that a normal, natural delivery is an abortion. The delivery of a live child into the world is a successful end to a mission. The term “abortion” is always used (I looked up several dictionary/Internet definitions) in a negative manner, the abrupt stoppage of an event gone wrong, a failure.”
I stand corrected. Thank you!
“No amount of bickering and squabbling over the “correct” term is going to change that. Only the Spirit of God can accomplish that miracle.”
Amen!
Still something to be said regarding “in utero infanticide” as pertaining to Roe v. Wade. And “sodomy” vs. “gay.” And others.
In my entire life, I have never described the homosexual lifestyle as “gay”. I never will. As to the infanticide issue, this just occurred to me. If/when abortions (in utero infanticides) are outlawed once again, have we, as a society, progressed far enough to assign them into different classes, each with a varying shade of punishment? You know, 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree murder, accidental manslaughter, manslaughter with intent, vehicular homicide, hate-homicide, drunken beyond self-control homicide, and all the other ridiculous types people use to justify whatever passes for “justice” these days? Can you imagine if this pertained to abortions?
Didn’t want to be pregnant.
Boyfriend forced me into it.
Not rich enough for a kid.
Figure ruination.
Would destroy my social status.
I think I’m going to be sick.
Etc., etc., etc.
And every one of these could, depending on the prosecuting attorney, be assigned a different class which the presiding judge would take into account if the defendant was found guilty. Oh, you poor dear! Minimum sentence with time off for good behavior.
Bullshit! Murder is murder is murder, whether committed against a person who has been born or one who has not.
Indeed!